FIX: Optimizer May Incorrectly Choose Reformat Strategy

Last reviewed: April 9, 1997
Article ID: Q159445
The information in this article applies to:
  • Microsoft SQL Server, version 6.5
BUG #: 15601 (NT 6.5)

SYMPTOMS

As stated in the SQL Server documentation, when joining tables, SQL Server may, use a reformatting strategy to join the tables and return the qualifying rows. This strategy is considered only as a last resort, when the tables are large and neither table in the join has a useful index.

However, this strategy, when chosen, may result in the query running slower than it would if either the join order of the tables in the query has been forced using the FORCEPLAN statement, or the underlying indexes on the joined tables were used.

WORKAROUND

To work around this problem, try using the SET FORCEPLAN ON statement before running the query.

STATUS

Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in Microsoft SQL Server version 6.5. This problem has been corrected in U.S. Service Pack 2 for Microsoft SQL Server version 6.5. For more information, contact your primary support provider.

MORE INFORMATION

When the data satisfying the query is largely in cache, the REFORMAT strategy chosen is slower than forcing the table join order or using the underlying indexes. However, when the data is obtained largely from disk, then the REFORMAT strategy chosen by the Optimizer is both valid and significantly faster than forcing the table join order using SET FORCEPLAN ON or using the underlying indexes on the tables.


Additional query words: slow performance showplan
Keywords : kbbug6.50 kbfix6.50.sp2 kbusage SSrvGen
Version : 6.5
Platform : WINDOWS


THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE MICROSOFT KNOWLEDGE BASE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. MICROSOFT DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER INCLUDING DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, LOSS OF BUSINESS PROFITS OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES SO THE FOREGOING LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY.

Last reviewed: April 9, 1997
© 1998 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use.